Análisis de las vacunaciones masivas contra el cólera utilizando vacunas orales reactivas
Reyburn R. , Deen JL, Grais RF; Bhattacharya SK, Sur D, Lopez AL, Jiddawi MS; “The Case for Reactive Mass Oral Cholera Vaccinations” http://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0000952#abstract0
Resumen
El artículo evalúa los beneficios potenciales de la vacunación masiva contra el cólera en cuanto a la cantidad de casos y de muertes que pudieran haberse evitado si hubiesen aplicado grandes campañas de vacunación durante la ocurrencia de los brotes. Para ello se utilizaron datos provenientes de brotes de cólera en tres sitios de la India, Tanzania y Zimbabwe.
Se demuestra que el uso de vacunas reactivas puede evitar los casos de cólera y constituye una respuesta racional ante los brotes de la enfermedad en escenarios endémicos y no endémicos.
The Case for Reactive Mass Oral Cholera Vaccinations
Introduction
The outbreak of cholera in Zimbabwe intensified interest in the control and prevention of cholera. While there is agreement that safe water, sanitation, and personal hygiene are ideal for the long term control of cholera, there is controversy about the role of newer approaches such as oral cholera vaccines (OCVs). In October 2009 the Strategic Advisory Group of Experts advised the World Health Organization to consider reactive vaccination campaigns in response to large cholera outbreaks. To evaluate the potential benefit of this pivotal change in WHO policy, we used existing data from cholera outbreaks to simulate the number of cholera cases preventable by reactive mass vaccination.
Methods
Datasets of cholera outbreaks from three sites with varying cholera endemicity—Zimbabwe, Kolkata (India), and Zanzibar (Tanzania)—were analysed to estimate the number of cholera cases preventable under differing response times, vaccine coverage, and vaccine doses.
Findings
The large cholera outbreak in Zimbabwe started in mid August 2008 and by July 2009, 98,591 cholera cases had been reported with 4,288 deaths attributed to cholera. If a rapid response had taken place and half of the population had been vaccinated once the first 400 cases had occurred, as many as 34,900 (40%) cholera cases and 1,695 deaths (40%) could have been prevented. In the sites with endemic cholera, Kolkata and Zanzibar, a significant number of cases could have been prevented but the impact would have been less dramatic. A brisk response is required for outbreaks with the majority of cases occurring during the early weeks. Even a delayed response can save a substantial number of cases and deaths in long, drawn-out outbreaks. If circumstances prevent a rapid response there are good reasons to roll out cholera mass vaccination campaigns well into the outbreak. Once a substantial proportion of a population is vaccinated, outbreaks in subsequent years may be reduced if not prevented. A single dose vaccine would be of advantage in short, small outbreaks.
Conclusions
We show that reactive vaccine use can prevent cholera cases and is a rational response to cholera outbreaks in endemic and non-endemic settings. In large and long outbreaks a reactive vaccination with a two-dose vaccine can prevent a substantial proportion of cases. To make mass vaccination campaigns successful, it would be essential to agree when to implement reactive vaccination campaigns and to have a dynamic and determined response team that is familiar with the logistic challenges on standby. Most importantly, the decision makers in donor and recipient countries have to be convinced of the benefit of reactive cholera vaccinations.
Author Summary
Cholera outbreaks have had catastrophic impact on societies for centuries. Despite more than half a century of advocacy for safe water, sanitation and hygiene, approximately 100,000 cholera cases and 5,000 deaths were reported in Zimbabwe between August 2008 and by July 2009. Safe and effective oral cholera vaccines have been licensed and used by affluent tourists for more than a decade to prevent cholera. We asked whether oral cholera vaccines could be used to protect high risk populations at a time of cholera. We calculated how many cholera cases could have been prevented if mass cholera vaccinations would have been implemented in reaction to past cholera outbreaks. We estimate that determined, well organized mass vaccination campaigns could have prevented 34,900 (40%) cholera cases and 1,695 deaths (40%) in Zimbabwe. In the sites with endemic cholera, Kolkata and Zanzibar, a significant number of cases could have been prevented but the impact would have been less dramatic. The barriers which currently prevent the implementation of mass vaccinations, including but not only the cost to purchase the vaccine, seem insurmountable. A concerted effort of donors and key decision makers will be needed to offer better protection to populations at risk.
Fuente: Fuente: PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases: The Case for Reactive Mass Oral Cholera Vaccinations. Disponible en: http://www.plosntds.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pntd.0000952#abstract0 [Accedido Febrero 9, 2011].
feb 9th, 2011. En: Investigaciones.